01 · Side by side

Side by side

Comparison sheet
AspectFAEActor-observer bias
AboutOthersSelf vs others
EvidenceStrongNear zero overall
Proposed1967 / 19771971
StatusStandingHeavily qualified
02 · Which one you meant

Which one did you mean?

In shortReaders who land here meaning Fundamental Attribution Error rather than Actor-observer bias are usually searching for phrases like “why do I assume the worst about strangers”, “fundamental attribution error examples”, “judging people by one moment”.

Fundamental Attribution Error

  • “why do I assume the worst about strangers”
  • “fundamental attribution error examples”
  • “judging people by one moment”
  • “character vs circumstance”

Actor-Observer Bias

  • “my lateness is traffic theirs is carelessness”
  • “actor observer bias explained”
  • “is actor observer bias real”
  • “double standards in explaining behaviour”
03 · Which came first

Which came first

In shortFAE. 1967 — Jones and Harris run the Castro-essay study: readers still inferred a writer held pro-Castro views even after being told the position had been assigned to him, not chosen.

  1. 1967

    Fundamental Attribution Error. Jones and Harris run the Castro-essay study: readers still inferred a writer held pro-Castro views even after being told the position had been assigned to him, not chosen.

  2. 1971

    Actor-Observer Bias. Edward Jones and Richard Nisbett propose the hypothesis: actors attribute their behaviour to the situation while observers attribute it to stable dispositions.

04 · The mix-up

Where the confusion comes from

The mix-up“It's the same thing as actor-observer bias.”
What's true

The FAE concerns how we explain other people, and it's well supported. The actor-observer extension — that we flip to situational explanations for ourselves — did not survive meta-analysis.

05 · Read either one

Read either one in full