Contemporary · United States

Susan Wolf

Analytic philosophy · meaning in life

She offered one of the most influential modern accounts of what makes a life meaningful — and it is neither 'follow your bliss' nor 'do what's objectively worthy,' but both at once. Susan Wolf argues that meaning lives at the meeting point of the two.

Susan Wolf is a contemporary American philosopher known for her influential account of meaning in life. She argues that meaning arises when 'subjective attraction meets objective attractiveness' — that is, when we are genuinely gripped by, and actively engaged with, projects that are also worth caring about. This 'fitting fulfillment' view charts a middle course between the idea that meaning is purely subjective and the idea that it is purely objective.

The one idea to take away
Subjective attraction meets objective attractiveness

Wolf's core idea is that a meaningful life requires two things to come together. There must be subjective attraction — you are genuinely drawn to, engaged by, and fulfilled by what you do. But that is not enough: the object of your passion must also have objective worth, be genuinely worth caring about. Meaning arises, she argues, only when both align: when you are actively engaged in projects that are themselves valuable. Loving something worthless, or dutifully serving something valuable you don't care about, each falls short.

What makes a life meaningful? Two familiar answers pull in opposite directions. One says meaning is purely subjective: a life is meaningful if it feels meaningful to the person living it, whatever they happen to care about. The other says meaning is objective: a life is meaningful if it's spent on things that are genuinely worthwhile, whether or not the person enjoys them. Susan Wolf argues that each answer, on its own, misses something essential — and that the truth lies in bringing them together.

Her formula is memorable: meaning arises when 'subjective attraction meets objective attractiveness.' Consider the two halves. Pure subjectivism can't be right, she argues, because we don't think a life spent in genuine but trivial passion — say, someone utterly absorbed in memorising phone books, or in a drug-induced haze — is truly meaningful, however satisfied the person feels. But pure objectivism can't be right either, because a life spent grimly doing worthwhile things one is completely alienated from, feeling nothing, also seems to lack meaning. Something is missing in each.

Meaning arises when subjective attraction meets objective attractiveness.Susan Wolf's formula

Fitting fulfillmentLoving something worth loving.

What meaning requires, on Wolf's view, is that the two come together: you are gripped by, and actively engaged with, projects that are also genuinely worth caring about. She calls this 'fitting fulfillment' — fulfillment that fits its object, because the object really merits it. The engineer absorbed in a project that helps people, the parent devoted to raising a child, the artist lost in work that has real value: in each case, passionate engagement and genuine worth coincide, and that coincidence is where meaning is found.

Wolf is careful about the 'objective' half. She does not claim to hand down a fixed list of worthy pursuits, and she acknowledges the difficulty of saying exactly what makes something objectively worth caring about. But she argues we can't do without the notion entirely — that our ordinary judgments about meaningful and empty lives already assume some things are more worth caring about than others. Her account has become a central reference point in the contemporary philosophy of meaning, precisely because it captures a truth both simpler theories leave out: that a meaningful life is one in which what we love and what is worth loving line up.

People also askQuick answers

What is Susan Wolf best known for?

Her influential account of meaning in life, summarised in the formula that meaning arises when 'subjective attraction meets objective attractiveness.' It charts a middle path between the views that meaning is purely subjective and purely objective.

What does 'subjective attraction meets objective attractiveness' mean?

It means a meaningful life requires two things together: being genuinely gripped by and engaged in what you do (subjective attraction), and that what you're engaged in is actually worth caring about (objective attractiveness). Meaning lives where both align.

Why does Wolf reject pure subjectivism about meaning?

Because a life of genuine but trivial passion — being utterly absorbed in something worthless — doesn't seem truly meaningful, however satisfied the person feels. Feeling fulfilled isn't enough; the object of that fulfillment has to genuinely matter.

What is the 'fitting fulfillment' view?

Wolf's name for her account: meaning consists in fulfillment that 'fits' its object — being actively engaged in projects that are genuinely worth caring about. Passionate engagement and real worth have to coincide for a life to be meaningful.

Sources & further reading

Summary of Susan Wolf's published views following standard scholarly accounts. As a summary of a living philosopher's work, it aims to represent her position fairly; see the sources for her own words.